In some cases, software companies even pay other SW/HW companies to include their product:
  
 - Google pays Mozilla for the search box in Firefox 
 - Yahoo pays Trillian for including the Yahoo toolbar in the installer
-  Symantec gives Norton Anti-Virus for free to Microsoft to Package with Windows
-  Microsoft includes Internet Explorer with Windows at an opaque cost to customer
 
The primary reasons for this is to generate Customer Lock-in or Vendor Lock-in.
 These Lock-in costs  create barriers to market entry for competition.
Customer Lock-in 
 - makes a customer unable to use another vendor without substantial Switching Costs
 - LOSS OF INVESTED LEARNING 
 - NEW LEARNING EFFORT
 - COMPATABILITY
Users resist change irrespective of benefits - They need to maintain the status quo unless sevre problems. Won't change just for additional benefits. 
E.g. Though Apple has better OS than Microsoft user resist the re-invested learning and compatability issues associated with switching. If all my colleagues use Microsoft Word and I switch to StarWord I will have inevitable compatability issues.
E.g. Though Firefox is more feature rich, user-friendly  and secure than Internet Explorer (IE), IE has greater market share because it is the status quo. There is a cost associated with switching.
Tuesday, 16 December 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment